Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
6 points by steadicat 6119 days ago | link | parent

I think the key point is that Ruby's power can be achieved with less syntax forms without compromises.

The fact that Python's way also happens to be shorter is not the main point, just an added plus.



2 points by jules 6119 days ago | link

Are you aware that x..y and x...y notation is a Range literal in Ruby? I like Pythons syntax better but range notation isn't special syntax for slices.

obj[a,b,...] is sugar for a method call in Ruby (you can define a [] method for your own classes). So there's really only two syntactic forms here, and arguably no special syntax for slices.

-----